Barry Rubin
Recently, an advocate of an attack on Syria remarked something along the following line to a much wiser expert:
“Some nerds try to tell a balanced truth but
that’s not effective in making policy.”
I
was shocked though not surprised. That is the cynical “player” view.
But even if the policy is right the cooking of intelligence is
dangerous.
DEBATING
WHETHER EVEN FIVE PERCENT OF THE SYRIAN REBELS ARE MODERATE IS LIKE
DEBATING WHETHER GRAVITY DOESN'T WORK OR WHETHER THE WORLD IS FLAT. IT
IS DEMONSTRABLY PROVABLE NONSENSE.
The
course of national security policy never runs smooth. Let’s remember
that towards the end of the Iran-Iraq war (1980-1988) Iranian forces had
chemical weapons used against themselves effectively Iraq on the Faw
Peninsula in southern Iraq.
And
the Iraqis used chemical weapons, too, most notably on the Iraq Kurdish
border village of Halabja. There were no U.S. air strikes in response.
That’s because the Americans were in effect on the Iraqi (!) side
trying to hold the threat of radical Islamism regarded as the greater of
the two evils even against Saddam Hussein.
Is
this true again? No. Realpolitik is a tough and nasty world in a tough
and nasty world. It is selective, unfair, but it should not be stupid.
The Syrians don’t act in favor of U.S. interests. Be sad to say cynical.
But
equally helping the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists win the war to
supposedly save
Western civilization from al-Qaida (and actually setting up a
tyrannical repressive state that will provoke future wars) is stupid,
too.
Let’s not sentimentalize the Syrian rebels. The problem is not to help them but, if anything. to set a red line.
And
remember there were atrocities in Syria in the years that the Obama
Administration courted Bashar al-Assad. Every person who is not lying
knows that the Syrian rebels are radical terrorist Islamists as Jonathan Spyer explains.
Everybody. And you can bet that if the opposition wins Chrustuans and
Alawites, perhaps Druze and Christians fear massacre. So did Christians
under the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
On
the other hand, note Egypt. In the 1990s, The Egyptian army fought
against a terrorist insurgency, not against the Brotherhood but against
the Salafis. The army even arrested wanted terrorist’s parents to get
them to turn themselves in.
That
was nasty but the U.S. was pursuing its legitimate interests in that
the Egyptian government was favorable to those interests and to regional
peace and stability.
Basically
the test of foreign policy is whether the “friend” wants to kill you
and war against you. Remember that’s what Iraq did after and there is
every reason to believe the Syrian rebels—like the Egyptian Brotherhood,
too—would do.
So
bomb Syria, maybe. But don’t aid al-Qaida and other anti-Americans with
weapons. A one-time attack on chemical weapons facilities will not win
the rebels the civil war nor should it try t0 do so. Assad knows that
which probably means he would not respond to an American attack.
Can
anyone in Washington
make that distinction between drawing a red line and installing a
nightmare regime, as bad as the present one, in Syria? Frankly I'm not
sure.
And that's it, If the administration is going to train rebels--and that's what it now hints--the administration is not drawing a red line but trying to find a back door for arms to rebels to put a Muslim Brotherhood government in Syria. It's a trick! Congress must vote NO on intervention in Syria! It is to fool Congress. These fools think that the only way to keep al-Qaida out of power is by putting the Brotherhood into power!
And that's it, If the administration is going to train rebels--and that's what it now hints--the administration is not drawing a red line but trying to find a back door for arms to rebels to put a Muslim Brotherhood government in Syria. It's a trick! Congress must vote NO on intervention in Syria! It is to fool Congress. These fools think that the only way to keep al-Qaida out of power is by putting the Brotherhood into power!
Professor Barry Rubin, Director, Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center http://www.gloria-center.org
Forthcoming Book: Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern
Middle East (Yale University Press)
The Rubin Report blog http://rubinreports.blogspot.com/
He is a featured columnist at PJM http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/.
Editor, Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal http://www.gloria-center.org
He is a featured columnist at PJM http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/.
Editor, Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal http://www.gloria-center.org
Editor Turkish Studies, http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ftur20#.UZs4pLUwdqU
No comments:
Post a Comment