Doc's Talk: MK Ahmad Tibi-Israel's Goebbels

Monday, February 03, 2014

MK Ahmad Tibi-Israel's Goebbels

Nurit Greenger
Paul Joseph Goebbels was a German politician and from 1933 to 1945 the Reich Minister of Propaganda in Nazi Germany. As one of Adolf Hitler's closest associates and most devout followers, Goebbels was known for his zealous orations and deep and virulent anti-Semitism, which led him to support the extermination of the Jews and to be one of the authors of the Final Solution. (Nazi Propaganda: 1933-1945 (http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/ww2era.htm#Speech

The Final Solution's goal and its virulent anti-Semitic sentiments were inherited by the Arabs and the majority of the Moslems including Arab Moslems living in the State of Israel and carrying Israeli citizenship. This can serve as a classic example of biting the hand that feeds you.

Living in the democratic State of Israel, these Israeli Arabs enjoy the freedoms a democracy offers its citizens, among which is the freedom of speech and representation in the government.

Goebbels once said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State. (https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/goebbelslie.html(. The Arabs, including the Arabs now calling themselves "Palestinians" have adopted this approach and they are using it, most successfully, in any which way possible, to harm and subvert Israel.
One such person is Ahmad Tibi, an Arab-Israeli politician and the leader of the Arab Movement for Change (Ta'al), an Arab political party in Israel. Tibi has been serving as a member of the Knesset, the Israeli Parliament, since 1999, and currently serves as Deputy Speaker of the Knesset. This man, an Israeli citizen, has become the Goebbels within the Jewish State who gets to spew his anti- Israel propaganda and lies from the very podium of the Knesset.

MK Ahmad Tibi-Goebbels Recently the prime minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, visited Israel in an official capacity. Known to be a very good friend of the Jewish state and unafraid to display his friendship, Harper delivered a speech in the Knesset which, even Benjamin Netanyahu could take a page from. No other politician in the entire world has said the truth about Israel and the Jewish people in such clear and honest words as Harper did. But for Tibi, praising Israel, a country in which he is a member of the legislative body, did not bode well with his Goebbels like outlook. When Harper strongly denied the accusations that Israel is an Apartheid state, Tibi could not contain himself and heckled Harper from the Knesset floor while the Canadian prime minister was addressing the Knesset. Let me remind Tibi that in South Africa, where the Apartheid term was coined, the classless and underdog black people in that country did not get to sit as members in the Pretoria Parliament, never mind spew venomous propaganda against the state from the platform of the Parliament.
(Watch Netanyahu's response to Tibi's heckling while Harper is witnessing it - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9Q1Q93C6qU)
Tibi's heckling Harper transformed the Arab-Israeli MK into a media sensation in Canada. Since the incident, Tibi has delivered over 15 interviews to Canadian media outlets and has been invited to speak at universities in multiple provinces. What message has he been propagating to the audiences so thirsty to hear his lies? Propaganda about how much he hates Israel and how much the alleged Apartheid system in Israel affects him and his fellow Arabs' lives? http://www.jpost.com/International/Heckling-Harper-helps-Arab-MK-Tibi-becomes-media-sensation-in-Canada-339208
As if that is not enough, the sad twist is that the entire world seems to have placed their bets on the Palestinian Authority (PA) Chairman Mahmoud Abbas the one to deliver a peace agreement with Israel. Abbas has earned the distinction of being named the 'Number One Anti-Semite' in the world! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNHh5gK74mI3
Abbas’ essence can be found in his background and ideology; a Holocaust denier in his youth, he denies the very existence of the Jewish people and their right to a Jewish state. He consistently incites against the Jews on posts to his website and on his TV channel. Israel's sad reality is that in the entire world there is no leader, but Abbas, worthy of making peace with her. Yet, no other leader gets so close to treating the Jews as in pre-Holocaust Europe as Abbas does! http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/176873
There is nothing stronger than reality. Also worth noting that democracy goes that far before it become a dangerous system to those practicing it and that is the situation in Israel.
The Arab-Palestinians' over the top and wild incitement is now matching Hitler's Goebbels back in the dark days of WWII. It is sad commentary about people with whom you are told to make peace and live in coexistence.
And when democracy goes beyond its boundaries, MK Tibi gets to stand in the Knesset and incite against the country in which he is a parliamentary representative. What does it say about the people he represents, all Israeli citizens?
Anti-Semitism enabled the Holocaust. It all began 2000 years ago when the Jews lost their homeland base and became stateless, wandering Jews. Now the anti-Semites' finger is pointed at the reborn state of Israel, to the extent that the anti-Semites blame Israeli soldiers for being Nazis. MK Tibi is a member of this clan.
Modern Zionism was conceived with two objectives to achieve – to enable the Jews to protect themselves from anti-Semites and to end anti-Semitism by normalizing Jews as a nation among all other nations. MK Tibi does not believe in these objectives and fights to prevent these objectives to be achieved.
Neither the Jewish state, nor the Jews in exilic communities, can end other people’s hatred of Jews, simply because Jews are not the root cause. Only the anti-Semites, through their own moral reckoning, with their anti-Semitic past and present, can do that.
To explain it in a clearer context, by bowing their heads, for five minutes, every year on January 27, in honor of the murdered Jews, the Europeans get to pretend that the Holocaust was exogenous, not organic and still very much a part of European civilization. MK Tibi does not so much as bow his head for one minute to honor the dead Jews who were murdered just because they were Jews. Has anyone called him out for this outrageous behavior?
Goebbels said, "If you tell a lie, tell a big one." MK Tibi is doing exactly that. The state of Israel and the Jewish people should not let democracy serve as a fig leaf for anti-Semites like MK Tibi by allowing him to continue being MK Tibi-Goebbels.

No comments:

The IDF’s Minorities in Numbers and Pictures

In honor of IDF Diversity Week, we present diversity through numbers and pictures. Each year, more and more Muslims, Christians, Druze, Bedouin and immigrants from around the world take on the responsibility of defending Israel.

MUSLIMS:

Muslim Arab Israelis are not required to draft in the IDF, but there are many who volunteer. In 2013, there were over 200 Muslims serving in the IDF and over 300 in the reserves.

Bedouins:

Bedouins are nomadic Muslims who were in Israel when modern borders were set in place and are now considered Israeli citizens. They are not required to draft but a growing number choose to enlist. In 2012, there were over 1,400 Bedouin Muslim soldiers doing regular IDF service and almost 1,500 in the reserves.

Read more:http://www.idfblog.com/2014/02/27/truth-idf-numbers-pictures/#more-34027

Are you aware that in 2013, Middle class taxes go up-significantly?

In January of next year, the federal income tax rate for middle-class taxpayers is scheduled to rise from 25 percent to 28 percent, and the payroll tax is scheduled to rise from 13.3 percent to 15.3 percent… This drives the marginal tax rate based on the aforementioned three taxes to 48.12 percent. Add in state and local property, corporate, excise, and other state and local taxes, and the percentage of each additional dollar that is taxed hovers around 50 percent… When half of each additional dollar earned is taxed away, taxpayers experience a disincentive to start businesses or expand existing ones. This leads to fewer jobs being created.

Why is HAMAS Inside Tampa Schools?

Clare Lopez

Kelly Miliziano, who teaches history classes at Steinbrenner High School in the Tampa, Florida area apparently thinks it’s perfectly OK to invite a senior official of a HAMAS-affiliated organization into her classroom to discuss Islam with her students. According to local media reports, not only has this been going on for years, but in spite of the civil and criminal proceedings that could result from such reckless negligence, the Hillsborough County school superintendent, Mary Ellen Elia, and the chairman of the school board, Candy Olson, also expressed approval for students under their responsibility to be exposed repeatedly to guest speaker, Hassan Shibly, who is the Executive Director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the Tampa area.
More...

Did You Know... Ignoring the Call to Islam will Bring Jihad

‘Conquest through Da’wa [proselytizing] that is what we hope for. We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America! Not through sword but through Da’wa.’
-- Yousef al-Qaradawi , Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader The Arabic word ‘Da’wa’ means the “call to Islam.” But do not think that Da’wa is the same thing as an invitation to an optional holiday event. The classical Islamic doctrine of jihad mandates that enemies must be given the opportunity to convert to Islam or pay the jizya tax before it is permissible to attack them.
Clare M. Lopez

Who is being discriminated-facts tell the truth

Religious bias

Hate crimes motivated by religious bias accounted for 1,409 offenses reported by law enforcement. A breakdown of the bias motivation of religious-bias offenses showed:

65.4 percent were anti-Jewish.
13.2 percent were anti-Islamic.
9.5 percent were anti-other religion, i.e., those not specified.
4.3 percent were anti-Catholic.
3.8 percent were anti-multiple religions, group.
3.3 percent were anti-Protestant.
0.5 percent were anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/hate-crime/2010/narratives/hate-crime-2010-incidents-and-offenses.

On March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview

with PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

In March 1977, Zahir Muhsein, a PLO executive, said:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct Palestinian people to oppose Zionism."

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

The Arab Apartheid

Ben-Dror Yemini
In 1948, the Arab countries refused to accept the UN partition proposal and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel which had barely been established. All precedents in this matter showed that the party that starts the war - and with a declaration of annihilation, yet - pays a price for it. Between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled because of the war and a larger number of 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the "Jewish nakba").
Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time, occurring in dozens of other conflict points and affecting about 52 million people. In all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state.
Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. Instead of assimilating the refugees, they crushed them despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation - instituting a regime of apartheid. So the "nakba" was not caused by the actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The "nakba" is the story of the apartheid, oppression, abuse and denial of rights suffered by the Arab refugees at the hands of the Arab countries. (Maariv)

International Law and Military Operations in Practice - Col. Richard Kemp

"Islamist fighting groups study the international laws of armed conflict carefully and they understand it well. They know that a British or Israeli commander and his men are bound by international law and the rules of engagement that flow from it. They then do their utmost to exploit what they view as one of their enemy's main weaknesses. Their very modus operandi is built on the correct assumption that Western armies will normally abide by the rules, while these insurgents employ a deliberate policy of operating consistently outside international law. "

Lost Historical Moments

What Rabin’s last Knesset speech really said:repudiation of a Palestinian state

Rabin ruled out a fully sovereign Palestinian state :

“We view the permanent solution in the framework of State of Israel which will include most of the area of the Land of Israel as it was under the rule of the British Mandate, and alongside it a Palestinian entity which will be a home to most of the Palestinian residents living in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. We would like this to be an entity which is less than a state, and which will independently run the lives of the Palestinians under its authority.”

Rabin ruled out a total withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and thus a return to the pre-June 1967 borders :

“The borders of the State of Israel, during the permanent solution, will be beyond the lines which existed before the Six Day War. We will not return to the 4 June 1967 lines.”

Rabin ruled out withdrawing form the Jordan Valley:

“The security border of the State of Israel will be located in the Jordan Valley, in the broadest meaning of that term.”

Rabin ruled out uprooting settlement blocs, like the Gush Katif bloc in Gaza (which was subsequently uprooted by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon):

“The establishment of blocs of settlements in Judea and Samaria, like the one in Gush Katif.

AND

Rabin ruled out removing any settlement before coming to a full peace agreement with the Palestinians:

“I want to remind you: we committed ourselves, that is, we came to an agreement, and committed ourselves before the Knesset, not to uproot a single settlement in the framework of the interim agreement, and not to hinder building for natural growth.”

Rabin insisted on Israel retaining full security control of the borders with Egypt and Jordan, contrary to Israel’s relinquishment of the Philadelphia Corridor on the border with Egypt:

“The responsibility for external security along the borders with Egypt and Jordan, as well as control over the airspace above all of the territories and Gaza Strip maritime zone, remains in our hands.”

Correcting Oslo Myths-Part 2

3) Kuttab laments that the post-1993 Oslo process resulted in a Palestinian Authority "whose ministers and legislators are not guaranteed passage between Gaza and the West Bank ...."

Before free passage or other perquisites, PA leaders were obligated, among other things, to eliminate the terrorist infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, end anti-Israeli, antisemitic incitement in schools, mosques, and communications media, and resolve all outstanding issues through peaceful negotiations. They met none of these commitments, sometimes bolstering terrorism and greatly increasing incitement.

4) Kuttab complains that under Oslo the PA got "lightly armed police ---- but no real sovereignty over the land or contiguity between our communities in Gaza and the West Bank."

Oslo agreements repeatedly were revised, regardless of Palestinian non-compliance, until the authorized number of police grew from 8,000 to 40,000. Though they were to be the only armed forces in the territories, Israeli estimates early in the second intifada put the number of gunmen - police, "security services," terrorists, and armed gangs - at 85,000. Their armament reportedly included not only heavy machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, but also anti-tank and anti-aircraft missiles.

Sovereignty was to be negotiated in the envisioned 1998 "final status" talks - after a five-year period of confidence-building. Palestinian leadership chronically undermined the process. Palestinian terrorism made the 1993 - 1998 Oslo period more deadly for Israelis than the 15 years preceding it.

The United States doesn't have contiguity between the lower 48 states and Alaska and Hawaii; territorial contiguity between the West Bank and Gaza Strip - that is, through the 20 miles of Israeli territory between them - was never promised and would destroy Israeli contiguity.

5) "Palestinians have been made to endure hundreds of checkpoints in the West Bank, an eight-foot wall deep in our territories, and tight Israeli control over borders."

The security barrier is not "deep in Palestinian territories," but rather encompasses less than 8 percent of Judea and Samaria, and is mostly a fence, rarely a wall; the land in question is not "our [Palestinian] territories" but disputed territory to which, according to the authors of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, Jews as well as Arabs have claims; and there are no international borders, only the 1949 armistice lines with Jordan. Under 242, borders remain to be negotiated. As for checkpoints - like the security barrier and "tight Israeli control" - Palestinian Arabs precipitated these measures themselves. No terrorism and there would be no fence or tight Israeli control and few checkpoints - like before the first intifada.

Correcting Some Oslo Myths

1) In Oslo "Israeli, Palestinian and other world leaders promised that ... Palestinian sovereignty would be solidified."

No, they didn't. The 1993 Declaration of Principles and subsequent Oslo agreements outlined a process by which final status negotiations about the West Bank and Gaza Strip would be reached. The process required an end to anti-Israel terrorism and incitement and a commitment to peaceful negotiations. The PA, Fatah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and other terrorist groups, sabotaged the process from the start.

2) "The reality is that, in defiance of U.N. Security Council Resolution 242, which states that it is inadmissible to occupy land by force, Palestinian territories are still under foreign military occupation."
Wrong again. Resolution 242 (1967) does note "the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war." It also affirms the right of every state in the area "to live in peace with secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." There were no "Palestinian territories." Jordan occupied the West Bank, Egypt controlled Gaza. Israel did not have "secure and recognized boundaries," so retention of some of those territories was possible under 242. Israel is not a "foreign" military occupier in the West Bank but, pending final negotiations, the lawful military administrator as a result of a successful war of self-defense.

Doc's Talk