Sultan Knish
There are as many ways to look at a man as there are at a glass of
water. Either half empty or half full. Either people are basically good
or they are basically rotten. And all theories of government come down
to one view or the other.
If people are basically good, then they can also be left to their own
devices. They may even be allowed to run their own affairs. If however
they are basically rotten, then a system is needed that will force
goodness on them. And this system's own goodness will be protected by
strict conformity to an ideology that is also inherently good. Those who
run the system can only be chosen from the ranks of the faithful
adherents of that ideology.
Arguments for goodness or "badness" are wholly anecdotal. And always has
been. A man walks into a school and murders children. A man throws
himself under a car to save a woman. Which of them is a definite
commentary on the species or the culture? That's a matter of picking and
choosing. Both are arguably exceptions to the rule. But on the whole we
have far more people who do not shoot anyone than those who do. Far
more who do not steal, than steal. Far more who may not wear a halo, or
that we would want to share a long train ride with, but who on the whole
could be trusted not to turn on their neighbors if one day every police
department within a 100 miles folds up shop.
Gun control, like most liberal social legislation, is a barometer for
the state of the human glass. It is a Rorschach test for how we see
others. This week's MSNBC commentary has been the usual notes about the
paranoia of gun owners. But if there is gun owner paranoia about being
attacked, it seems to be outmatched by the paranoia of gun controllers
who believe that every gun owner is a ticking time bomb. Or pretend to
believe it when the red light turns on and the commercial break ends.
"How much firepower does a law-abiding gun owner need?" is the leading
talking point of the gun controllers. But it could just as well be, "How
much cold medicine does a law-abiding sneezer need?" Cold medicine has
been regulated to the extent that you need a photo ID if your nose is
stuffed up under a bill sponsored by a community organizer from Chicago
who stayed briefly in the Senate on his way to bigger and worse things.
And people have been arrested for buying too much cold medicine.
If you believe that people are basically good, then they can be trusted
with an AR-15. If you believe that people are basically bad, then they
can't even be trusted with cold medicine.
We have come a long way from the muckrakers who headed downtown from
their cozy digs, toting along heavy cameras and notebooks to document
the conditions there. And proposed reforms. Some of the reforms were
even salutary. Others were cruel and capricious. The reformers saw to it
that a woman walking alone in 19th Century New York City could be
arrested for prostitution. Because if you believe that people are
basically bad... then you already know the rest of the story whether
it's cold medicines, guns or a woman walking down the street.
When you dig up enough dirt, then everyone looks dirty and the
justification is there for a mandatory clean-up program. That is what
the reformers and the muckrakers accomplished by displaying an image of a
broken society. Their work was selective and biased, and they insisted
on defining the city by its worst parts, and the entire country by the
city. Their grand achievements have culminated in a national system of
one-size-fits-all legislation. Lanza is America. America is Lanza.
Mayor Bloomberg is right that New York City has a problem with gun
violence, but it's not a problem caused by guns. Still talking about
guns is easier than talking about shooters. Urban mayors are waging war
on gun shops in more rural and better behaved parts of the country as if
urban social problems come from those gun shops, when if anything it's
the other way around.
Periods of urban social malaise are routinely followed by vigorous
reform efforts by mayors who break free of machine politics and forcibly
assert control over the physical and social landscape of the city.
Bloomberg is a particularly poor follow-up to men like LaGuardia or
Giuliani, but he's following the same pattern of trying to perfect the
city by turning it into a perfect prison. And unlike LaGuardia or
Giuliani, Bloomberg is trying to take his perfect prison campaign
national.
Bloomberg is a living model of the glass half-full theory of human
behavior. This is after all a man who banned large sodas, and if you
can't trust people to have large sodas, then you can't trust them to
have cold medicines, let alone guns. Where does it end? It ends the same
place it ends in a prison. Nowhere. If you believe that people are
basically bad, then every problem you identify is met with another
control measure until you control absolutely everything.
With a big city politician in the White House, for the first time in a
long time, the progressive impulse to extend that total net of control
over everything and everyone seems to have come together. The old urban
muckrakers became sociologists and community activists and then
community organizers all over again in the great circle of rich kid
busybodying. They are still looking for the worst possible examples of
human behavior to justify total crackdowns on everything and everyone.
Fix the social problems by fixing the people. Fix the people by
controlling their environment. Total control for total social morality.
The social missionaries became social activists. The social activists
have become social despots. Their single ability resides in documenting a
condition, generalizing it and then crowding the cameras and newspapers
and demanding immediate action. And they have gotten it over and over
again. And we are much worse for it.
Most cities are once again trending downhill. A century ago the cities
were centers of industry and commerce. Now they are warehouses for the
poor who have no jobs and will never have jobs. The progressives cleaned
up some of the messes and replaced them with static broken systems deep
in debt and with no hope of a future. And that is their plan for the
rest of the country.
The cities are chock full of laws but not law abiding. There are three
classes of people in this perfect prison. The working lower, middle and
upper, classes who care about the law. The welfare classes who care
nothing for the law. And the upper upper classes who buy their way out
of the law.
Laws apply to law abiding people, who are a self-selecting group. They
don't apply to people who shoot up schools, fast food joints or pension
funds. The people who are the most controlled are also the people in the
least need of being controlled. The people who are least controlled are
in the most need of being controlled. This is an old paradox of
government that governments never deal with.
Meth will go on being cooked, regardless of how often Joe Q. Public is
forced to show his photo ID at the pharmacy. Schools will go on being
shot up no matter how many assault rifle bans are passed. Most cops
still know that law enforcement is small scale, it's about what you do
on one block, not about the big picture press conferences and proposals.
But those still keep coming along with the dream of a magic social
bullet. A way to fix the problem at the source. A perfect prison that
will finally work.
The magic bullets are all about bigger scale crackdowns. Bigger laws and
bigger prisons. Don't bust meth dealers, outlaw cold medicines. Don't
bust gangbangers, bust the gun industry. It's the type of thinking that
exemplifies college smarts over real world smarts. Real world smarts
says you have to get dirty to fix a problem and then you have to go on
fixing it day after day while accepting that it will never really be
fixed. College smarts says that a problem that has to be fixed over and
over again is bad design and has to be put under a microscope so that it
can be fixed once and for all.
Under the microscope everyone is bad. In the big picture, everyone is
the problem. We're all to blame because we're all one social organism.
Why bother building prisons for individuals who are only the victims of
society, the victims of us all, when a prison can be built for all of us
instead? Free the criminals and the mental patients, and put everyone
under the same regime as them. Turn every city into a prison and then
turn the country into a prison. That's big picture thinking. That's
college smarts.
If people are mostly bad, then the place for them is in a prison and the
entire country needs to be one big prison complete with millions of
armed guards, countless administrators and rules, where every man, woman
and child must account for everything that they do to someone. The
state becomes a prison and the prison becomes the state.
No comments:
Post a Comment