This is from the website of Arnold and Frimet Roth, "This Ongoing War."
22-Jun-12: A wedding and what came before it
By Ben Cohen/JNS.org
While the Israeli government justifies releasing 1,027 Palestinian terrorists (in exchange for Shalit) through the rationale that safety is improved when terrorists leave the country, Arnold Roth—whose daughter was killed in the infamous Sbarro bombing by now-freed terrorist Ahlam Tamimi—isn’t buying that argument.Having experienced hijackings, cross-border incursions, gun attacks and suicide bombings across several decades, Israelis also know too well that the damage wreaked by terrorist atrocities can reverberate for years after these insidious acts are committed.
Internal
divisions often accompany that lasting damage. In the immediate
aftermath of a terrorist attack, the country invariably unites in grief,
but splits emerge when the feelings of those families scarred by
terror attacks conflict with decisions that the government deems to be
in the national interest.
A prime case in point involves Arnold and Frimet Roth, whose 15-year-old daughter, Malki, was murdered along with 14 others when a suicide bomber struck the Sbarro pizza restaurant
in downtown Jerusalem on Aug. 9, 2001. Ahlam Tamimi, a Palestinian
woman who transported both the bomb and the bomber to the restaurant,
was subsequently captured and sentenced to 16 life terms in prison.
In October 2011,
as part of the deal in which 1,027 Palestinian prisoners were
exchanged for Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier who spent more than
five years in Hamas captivity, Tamimi walked free. Now living in
Jordan, Tamimi has become a celebrity in the Arab world, hosting her own
weekly show on the Hamas satellite TV station, Al Quds. In
between extolling the virtues of “martyrdom attacks” against Jews, she
celebrates her own monstrous achievement; on one famous occasion, when
she learned that she had enabled the killing of eight children at the
Sbarro restaurant, and not three as she had previously thought, she
turned to the camera wearing a broad grin of pride.
Six months
before the Shalit deal, the Roths and their many supporters implored
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to consider Tamimi’s
release as part of any exchange. Netanyahu, they say, did not respond
then. Nor did he respond when the Roths challenged Netanyahu's claim
that the families impacted by the Shalit deal had been sent a letter
explaining the government’s position; they could find no evidence, they
insisted, that such a letter had been sent.
Now the Roths are accusing Netanyahu of ignoring them for a third time.
The occasion was
the news that another convicted terrorist, Nizar al Tamimi, had crossed
the Allenby Bridge from the West Bank into Jordan to join his cousin
and ertswhile fiancée—none other than the murderer-turned-TV star Ahlam
Tamimi. Nizar, who was serving a life sentence for the murder of a
Jewish resident of the West Bank in 1993, was also released under the
terms of the Shalit deal. While Ahlam and Nizar’s victims will never
recover from the grief inflicted by their grotesque crimes, the Arabic
press is reporting that the couple is currently planning their wedding.
This month, the
Roths wrote an open letter to Netanyahu pointing out that Nizar al
Tamimi’s release “was conditioned on the requirement that he remain at
all times within the areas controlled by the Palestinian
Authority.” His reunion with their daughter's murderer came, therefore,
as a massive blow to the Roths, who were already aware that Tamimi had
previously tried to enter Jordan and been turned back.
“I called
someone who has a very senior position in the Ministry of Justice,”
Arnold Roth told me. “He said, ‘it’s never going to happen,’ but
advised me to check nonetheless. I chased the Shabak (Israel’s security
service) for two and a half weeks. When I finally got a reply, I was
told that there was a decision to allow Nizar to leave, provided that
he doesn’t come back within five years.” Roth hired a lawyer to
challenge the decision, but it was too late—Nizar al Tamimi arrived in
Jordan on June 7. “I felt like I’d been hit over the head with a cricket
bat,” Roth, an Australian who made aliyah, recalled in his
conversation with me.
I contacted
Israeli government officials to find out their reasoning. After
encountering some initial reluctance, I received a call from Mark
Regev, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s spokesman. “I understand Arnold’s pain
and the pain of those whose family members have been killed by
terrorists, when they see those guilty of these horrendous crimes being
released,” Regev said. However, he stressed, the current situation is a
direct outcome of the Shalit deal. “Everything flows from that,” Regev
said. “Arnold’s position is a legitimate one that we respect.
Ultimately, the government chose the path of getting Gilad Shalit out of
captivity.”
Though he was
unwilling to discuss the specific details of Nizar al Tamimi’s case,
Regev did explain the strategic principle behind the government’s
thinking. “Israel does not have a problem with terrorists leaving,” he
said. “It’s easier for us when hardcore terrorists actually leave. Their
ability to hurt us in the future is much more limited.”
Arnold Roth is
not persuaded by this argument. In an email to me subsequent to our
conversation, he pointed out that another terrorist released through
the Shalit deal, Ibrahim Abu Hijleh, had been rearrested. “f they want
terrorists out of the country, why did they explicitly restrict more
than 100 of them, including Nizar al-Tamimi, to the area controlled by
the PA?” Roth wrote. “That’s a decision they took in October 2011.
Since they made that decision then, why did they change it now? And
without any announcement? And without consulting any of the victims?”
Lack of
consultation with the victims is a recurring theme among critics of the
Israeli government’s actions in this sensitive area. “Israeli
government decision-making related to the release of terrorists and
related issues continues to be highly secretive, often inexplicable, and
entirely insensitive to the families of the victims,” Professor Gerald
Steinberg, the President of NGO Monitor, a leading Israel advocacy
organization, told me in an email. “The mass release in the Shalit
exchange, and now facilitating al Tamimi’s ‘family reunification,’ has
continued the cruel pattern of shutting out the families of the terror
victims, while eroding Israeli deterrence against the perpetrators of
mass terror.”
It is against this charged background that the Roths are demanding answers. The Israeli government can, of course, say that it is providing
answers; but the problem with those answers is that they raise even
more painful questions. Clarity is needed, and that’s why Prime Minister
Netanyahu should finally sit down in person with Arnold and Frimet
Roth. True, such an encounter may well turn out to be a fractious one.
That is better than a continuing silence that comes across as cold
indifference.
Ben Cohen is
the Shillman Analyst for JNS.org. His writings on Jewish affairs and
Middle Eastern politics have been published in Commentary, the New York
Post, Ha’aretz, Jewish Ideas Daily and many other publications.
No comments:
Post a Comment