Robert R. Reilly
Special to IPT News
January 7, 2013
http://www.investigativeproject.org/3876/guest-column-will-egypt-become-a-totalitarian
Note: This column originally appeared Dec. 26, 2012 on the website Mercator.Net.
The
Muslim Brotherhood has made another giant step forward in consolidating
its rule in Egypt through the successful passage of the newly drafted
constitution by some 64 percent of those who voted. Next come the
parliamentary elections in two months through which the Brotherhood will
regain control of the legislative branch. In the interim, it has
stacked the upper house of Parliament, called the Shura Council, with
its own members who will have the power to legislate until the new lower
house is elected.
President Mohammed Morsi has already successfully decapitated and
made peace with the powerful Egyptian military. The new constitution has
given him the power to purge the Supreme Constitutional Court by
reducing its size from 18 to 11 members. The president of the Lawyers'
Syndicate, Sameh Ashour, pointed out the goal: "These are monopolistic
plans. The Brotherhood wants to control all aspects of the state."
In other words, this will be a clean sweep.
Why worry? Isn't Islamist democracy just a step on the way to
democracy as it is understood in the West? Isn't that why the United
States is supporting Egypt, and why the US administration has courted
the Muslim Brotherhood since President Barack Obama seated its members
in the front row for his famous speech in Cairo in 2009? Isn't this all
part of the Arab spring?
The novelist Saul Bellow once wrote that, "A great deal of
intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is
deep." To maintain the illusion that the Muslim Brotherhood is intent on
transforming Egypt into a democracy requires the application of
considerable ignorance. The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in 1928 in
reaction to Kemal Ataturk's abolition of the caliphate in 1924. Its
ultimate aim is to restore the caliphate. Its vehicle for doing so,
according to founder Hassan al-Banna, is a one-party system akin to that
of the Soviet Union under Stalin. Al-Banna envisaged a bottom-up
strategy in which people would be Islamized at the local level first.
For this purpose, he created his party. After winning the masses, the
Muslim Brotherhood would take total control.
Why is total control necessary? The chief ideologue of the
Muslim Brotherhood, Sayyid Qutb, wrote that, "Islam chose to unite earth
and heaven in a single system." What does this mean? It means that the
separate realms of the divine and the human have collapsed into each
other, and that it will now be possible, as Qutb said, "to abolish all
injustice from the earth."
This, of course, is a millenarian vision similar, in many ways, to
the Marxist dream of creating a classless society based on the abolition
of scarcity. If perfect justice is to be achieved here, rather than
before God's throne in the final judgment, several things will be
required by those who institute it. They will, in fact, need the very
same things that God is thought to possess in his ability to achieve
perfect justice. Those two things are omnipotence and omniscience. The
omnipotence will be gained through the establishment of a totalitarian
regime. The omniscience will be obtained, as it always has been in
totalitarian regimes, through an extensive secret police apparatus.
What does the Brotherhood's version of Islam look like in this
scheme? As indicated above, it does not look like a normal religion,
which preserves the distinction between the earthly and the
transcendent. It is a revolutionary ideology aimed at the total
transformation of reality. Here is its view, as expressed by the de facto
spiritual head of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi:
"Islam is a comprehensive school of thought, a creed, an ideology, and
cannot be completely satisfied but by [completely] controlling society
and directing all aspects of life, from how to enter the toilet to the
construction of the state."
However, some analysts suggest that, since its founding 84 years ago,
the Muslim Brotherhood has evolved and, when in power, will evolve even
more. This is always the hope of those who fail to recognize the
essentially totalitarian nature of certain political movements and
principles that are not subject to change. Similar hopes were expressed
about the Nazi Party and various Marxist parties. They would mature in
power, the exercise of which would transform them in a moderate
direction. This, of course, did not happen, though these parties often
fostered the impression that it was. Rather, these widely held illusions
actually enabled these totalitarian parties to consolidate their power.
The Muslim Brotherhood is a hard-core cadre party. It takes eight
years of training to become a full member. Let us listen to the
Brotherhood's leadership today concerning its mission and its prospects
of changing. The Deputy Guide of the Brotherhood, Khairat al-Shater,
said: "The mission is clear: restoring Islam and its all-encompassing
conception; subjugating people to God; instituting the religion of God:
the Islamization of life, empowering of God's religion; establishing the
Nahda of the Ummah [Muslim nation] on the basis of Islam."
As for change, al-Shater proclaimed that, "no one can come and say:
'let's change the overall mission'… No one can say, 'forget about
obedience, discipline and structures'… No. All of these are constants
that represent the fundamental framework for our method; the method of
the Muslim Brotherhood. It is not open for developing or change."
So, this is where Egypt is now headed. Some, such as Alber Saber, 27,
who was accused of blasphemy this past fall, say of the Brotherhood,
"They are no different from the former regime. The weapons have changed,
but they are both oppressive regimes." He might very well wish this
were so, but it is common experience that authoritarian regimes are
considerably more limited in their reach and cruelty than totalitarian
regimes. They wish to maintain power, but do not have the metaphysical
ambition of transforming reality. This, in other words, will be worse
than Mubarak.
Sudanese writer Al-Hajj Warraq, got this exactly right in an Egyptian
television interview earlier this year: "Democracy is about more than
just the ballot box. Democracy is a culture engraved upon the cerebral
box before it is the ballot box. One cannot talk about freedom in the
absence of free minds. The tragedy of the Arab Spring is that when the
tyrannical regimes fell, the fruits were reaped by movements that preach
closed-mindedness, rather than free thinking. The outcome will be
regimes that are worse than those that were toppled."
As indicated earlier, totalitarian regimes, before achieving total
control, can display considerable tactical flexibility. When the economy
of the Soviet Union was near a state of collapse in the 1920s, Vladimir
Lenin had no trouble in instituting a limited free market New Economic
Policy, which was later revoked once the danger had passed. The Soviets
were expert in creating the impression that they were changing in some
fundamental way in order to gain aid from the West to save the
revolution. The Muslim Brotherhood has already displayed this kind of
tactical dexterity through its use of democratic rhetoric and elections
to gain assistance from the West and to lull its opponents. As the
Islamist Prime Minister of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan once said,
"democracy is just the train we board to reach our destination."
Displaying this kind of flexibility, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, suggested
that Islamic law, sharia, should be implemented gradually in Egypt: "I
think that in the first five years, there should be no chopping off of
hands." One must prepare the ground first.
However, the final destination has been clear from the beginning.
Brotherhood founder al-Banna announced: "it is the nature of Islam to
dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its laws on all nations and
extend its power to the entire planet."
Stop the train: I want to get off.
Robert R. Reilly is a member of the board of the Middle East Media Research Institute and the author of The Closing of the Muslim Mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment