Tuesday, May 20, 2014

You have to ask WHY?

DEMOCRAT Senator Dianne Feinstein compares Benghazi Select Committee to a “lynch mob”

 

Gee, I wonder why Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) clearly doesn’t want the truth about Benghazi made public? Could it have anything to do with the secret gunrunning operation from Libya to al Qaeda-linked jihadist rebels in Syria?

Shoebat  As the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Feinstein would have been one of eight members of Congress who received a highly classified ‘annex’ to a bipartisan U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report (SSCI) released earlier this year, according to veteran journalist Seymour Hersh.

The contents of classified annex could go a long way in explaining why Feinstein wants Benghazi to go away. Principally, that would be about not being ensnared by said investigation.

times1x

As relayed by Shoebat.com, here is what that annex is allegedly about :

A highly classified annex to the (SSCI) report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping. The operation was run by David Petraeus, the CIA director who would soon resign when it became known he was having an affair with his biographer. 

427939_506759522676826_400585149_n

That level of detail certainly comports with the previous reporting of the very credible Catherine Herridge, relayed by Shoebat.com and an admission by Speaker of the House John Boehner, who one year before the SSCI report was released, conceded that weapons were being shipped out of Benghazi to Turkey.


No comments: