Robert Spencer
The election has been marred with
ugly undertones of anti-Semitism: one candidate accuses the other of
being more loyal to Israel than to his own land, and anchors his
candidacy in ethnic and religious identity politics. Observers fear that
by making his anti-Israel stance the lynchpin of his campaign, the
candidate is setting a precedent that could have severe negative
consequences in the near future.
All this sounds as if it could be taking place in Egypt, where Muslim
Brotherhood candidate Mohammed Morsi has signaled that he wants to
review, if not discard outright, that nation’s peace treaty with Israel,
and has taken such a hardline anti-Israel stance that his secular
opponent, Ahmed Shafiq, has accused
the Brotherhood of acting as if “Palestine is the capital of Egypt.”
But this election is not taking place in Egypt, or anywhere that Islamic
anti-Semitism might be expected to resonate with the electorate. This
anti-Semitic mudslinging is going on in a congressional race in New
Jersey.
Steve Rothman is a Democrat who was first elected to Congress from
New Jersey’s Ninth District in 1996. He is also Jewish. He currently
faces a tough reelection challenge from Bill Pascrell, a Roman Catholic
who entered Congress at the same time as Rothman and now, because of
redistricting, finds himself in Rothman’s district. In the district also
is a sizeable contingent of Arabs and Muslims, who have injected an
unprecedented level of Jew-baiting into the campaign. Said Ben Chouake,
president of NORPAC, a pro-Israel political action committee: “One side
says, ‘We want this Jew out of office’ and, frankly, it’s pretty
unsettling. They emphasized,” he noted, that Rothman is “a Jewish
congressman.”
he Washington Free Beacon published an image of an Arabic-language poster
(reproduced at left) claiming that the Rothman/Pascrell race was “the
most important election in the history of the [Arab] community” and
exhorting the “Arab diaspora community” to vote for Pascrell as “the
friend of the Arabs.” In February, Aref Assaf, the president of the
American Arab Forum, wrote an op-ed in the New Jersey Star-Ledger titled
“Rothman is Israel’s man in District 9.” Assaf asserted that “as total
and blind support for Israel becomes the only reason for choosing
Rothman, voters who do not view the elections in this prism will need to
take notice. Loyalty to a foreign flag is not loyalty to America’s.”
Assaf hoped that Muslim voters in New Jersey’s Ninth District would
defeat Rothman: “We will soon find out if Muslim religious leaders will
reach out to their respective congregations.” He titled another column
last week “Congressman Pascrell is best for New Jersey,” but he sounded
as if it were more important to him, and to the district’s Arab and
Muslim voters, that Rothman has been identified as a “pro-Israel
stalwart.” Assaf even asserted that “various media outlets have framed
the race as a litmus test for the survival of Israel,” and observed
happily that “Arab and Muslim grassroots meetings are forming all over
District 9, strategizing for a massive voter turnout, with voter
registration drives outside mosques and along Main Street, fundraising,
and a targeted mobilization of volunteers. … The candidates’ position on
Palestine appears paramount, and for many, it has already informed
their expected vote.”
One key reason why Assaf is so happy with Pascrell is his support for
a local imam, Mohammed Qatanani, who is fighting a legal battle to
become a permanent resident of the U.S. Yet investigative journalist
Daniel Greenfield reports, in connection with earlier attempts to deport
the imam, that “despite the fact that Mohammed Qatanani was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, the organization that is behind both al-Qaeda and Hamas, despite his own guilty plea to being a member of Hamas, and despite the fact that even in the United States, he had defended a charity that
provided funds to children of suicide bombers (this is done as an
incentive to reassure terrorists that if they die their families will be
taken care of), Qatanani was not deported.”
Assaf’s support for the Hamas- and Muslim Brotherhood-linked Qatanani
makes it clear that behind much of the Arab and Muslim opposition to
Rothman is the same Islamic anti-Semitism that motivates Hamas and
Hizballah and makes any peace settlement between the Israelis and the
Palestinian Arabs impossible to sustain: the jihad against Israel will
ultimately be satisfied with nothing less than the destruction of the
Jewish State, as is enunciated in the Hamas Charter
via a quotation from Muslim Brotherhood founder Hasan al-Banna: “Israel
will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it,
just as it obliterated others before it.”
The foes of Israel know the stakes are high. Assaf noted that the
American Arab Institute’s James Zogby recently raised $50,000 for
Pascrell, and that Muslim Brotherhood-linked Muslim Congressman Keith
Ellison (D-MN) recently appeared at a local mosque to stump for
Pascrell. And in yet another op-ed last week,
Assaf emphasized the necessity to develop the power of the Muslim
voting bloc: “Candidates and political parties will use this information
in the 2012 elections to determine which groups of voters are important
and which groups are not. The more we vote this year, the more
important our community will be in future elections. In New Jersey’s
Ninth District race between Pascrell and Rothman, our vote will be of
pivotal significance to the outcome.”
It may well be. And it has already introduced an unwelcome new
feature into American politics: Islamic anti-Semitism. One may hope that
Representative Pascrell will decide to act the statesman and repudiate
his unsavory and hateful supporters; but statesmanlike conduct is in
unfortunately short supply in American politics these days.
No comments:
Post a Comment