Bismillah al-Rahman al-Raheem
Introduction
NOTE: This is first part of a long series-I post it to educate the West what our enemies are saying, writing, believing-please take heed! Please notice the web site from which I posted this...need I say more?
The Islamic world is experiencing
nowadays, especially in the Arabic-speaking countries, severe birth
pangs whose consequences will be decisive either in favour of the
Islamic Ummah or the Kuffar under the leadership of America, Allah
forbid. The real plane of the battle is cultural, i.e. a battle of
thoughts, or what America has labelled as the “Battle for Hearts and
Minds”. Military battles result in killing people and destroying
equipments and properties, whereas the battles of thoughts result in
directing the behaviour of nations and individuals, transforming their
way of life and changing their raison d’être. They are the most
dangerous and the fiercest of battles and their knock-on effect on
nations and peoples could last for decades and even centuries in some
cases.
The real battle that toppled the Ottoman
Islamic Khilafah was a battle of thoughts; the rules of Islam were
attacked because they supposedly were behind the times, the bond of
Islamic fraternity was attacked by evoking ethnic tendencies and the
post of Khilafah was attacked sometimes because it purportedly
represented the dictatorial rule and sometimes because it was allegedly
theocratic, i.e. a divine authority, since the Khalifah to the Muslims
was like the Pope to the Christians, though there was no room for
comparison between the two posts. Some educated individuals smitten by
the concepts of Western civilisation at that time were duped into
thinking that separating religion from the state would achieve progress.
Once the state started to stagger under
the influence of the cultural invasion that targeted the Ummah, who had
been experiencing a state of intellectual decline, some of its citizens
delivered the coup de grace from within when, under the tutelage of the
Kafir West, the traitor Mustafa Kemal Ataturk announced the abolition of
the post of Khilafah and declared Turkey as a nationalist secular state
that separated religion from life. Once the Ottoman Khilafah was
destroyed, the colonial powers shared the lands of Islam and fragmented
them into states and emirates, drawing their borders and establishing
for each an army, a constitution and laws; they also established for
each new state a flag, a capital and a ruler – guardian of the Western
interests.They consolidated this fragmentation with independence days to
effectively celebrate the dividing of the Muslims’ lands.
The
new states were originally established on the basis of separating Islam
from the life of the Muslims, discarding it from the transactional
affairs of the state and society and confining it to the relationship of
the individual with Allah (swt), i.e. the rituals.
The Islamic Ummah is always magnetised
towards her Islam irrespective of the multiple styles of deception
targeting her to strip her off her religion and its rules, because she
is a noble nation and she only finds delight in the system of Islam.
Although she was oblivious to the division of the lands of Islam after
she had been deceived, she does not relish division because Shari’ah
calls for the rejection of division. Hence, the secular regimes that
ruled the Islamic countries after the destruction of the Khilafah were
characterised with oppression and an iron-fist approach to prevent
people from making their real choice, as secularism, i.e. separating
religion from life, had never been a real choice for the Ummah.
In the middle of the 20th century and
about 25 years after the destruction of the Khilafah, the Da’awah (call)
for the resumption of the Islamic way of life by restoring Islam as the
foundation of the State emerged, exhorting the Ummah to refer her
affairs to Islam’s rules and laws. This Da’awah drew the attention of
Ummah anew to come round from her slumber and take heed of her religion
which had been the authority in her life, the sole reference point in
her affairs and the cause of her happiness, pride and pre-eminence among
other nations.
Towards the end of the seventies in the
past century, and after the eruption of the revolution in Iran with the
emergence of a regime announcing its rise on the basis of Islam, the
Muslims became aware of the practicable return of the rule by Islam. The
pace of the Da’awah for restoring Islam as a ruling authority gathered
momentum and the West dubbed the ensuing period as the “Islamic
Awakening”.
America however, who had been behind the
toppling of the Shah by exploiting the Ummah’s genuine love of her
Islam and using it then to declare the “Jihad in Afghanistan” to
destabilise the Soviet Union, was herself behind the plot to strike the
“Twin Towers”. This was in order to instigate the “War on Terror”,whose
main objectives was to extinguish the spark of the Ummah’s awakening
that had started to ignite the fervour of the Muslim youths to gain more
awareness about the reality of Islam and to work towards restoring it
in the realm of life by establishing the authority upon its basis. Thus,
the policy of combating terror was the pretext aimed at aborting that
phenomenon, which began to petrify the Kafir West headed by America.
The Western Kuffar, led by America, are
fully aware that the persistent awakening of the Ummah with such an
impetus and at that growing pace will inevitably place them on a
collision course with the Islamic Ummah; thus they hastened to put their
plans into motion after they had carried out extensive studies with the
help of research centres that dedicated all their efforts for the
monitoring of that awakening and its consequences.Then they immediately
embarked upon executing their plans to divert that awakening and fight
it with all means possible, including killing, detaining, and torturing
the Muslim youths who were eager to support their religion, in addition
to sidetracking their progress and distorting their reputation and the
image of Islam in the eyes of the Muslims and the other nations and
states, using their enormous propaganda machine and exploiting the media
outlets of their surrogates and agents from among the gang leaders whom
America appointed to rule the Muslims’ countries.
The American version of the Greater
Middle East Initiative was announced in 2004 during the G8 summit. After
extensive deliberations on the French and German projects and following
the counsel of a host of experts, it was decided to refrain from
referring to any of the proposed projects as the “project for the
Islamic World” and from any reference to Islam, so as not to arouse the
attention of the Muslims to the animosity of the Kafir West, led by
America, towards Islam and the Muslims. Not withstanding dubbing the
project as the “Grater Middle East Initiative” is more accurate since
most of the countries of the Islamic world were geographically added to
the project; the Greater Middle East Initiative includes the Islamic
countries from Afghanistan in the east to Morocco and Mauritania in the
west, and from Turkey in the north to Yemen and Sudan in the south.
The main objective of the Grater Middle
East Initiative is to reshape the region of the Islamic world in a
manner that would secure America’s unilateral dominion in the 21st
century. America realised that safeguarding her dominion requires
predominantly alienating Islam from the realm of life, i.e. maintaining
the separation of religion from running the affairs of the Islamic Ummah
and preventing the Ummah from thinking about resuming her life on the
basis of Islam. This could only be brought about by persuading the Ummah
of the necessity to keep Islam away from politics, i.e. away from the
state, the authority and the managing of the Ummah’s affairs, and
confine it to the relationship between the servant and his Lord, namely
the “spiritual worships”.
Keeping Islam away from the life of the Muslims entails the following:
- Generating
a conviction among the Muslims themselves about the necessity of
maintaining Islam away from attaining power, i.e. away from the life of
the Ummah, under a host of pretexts such as: averting the world’s
backlash against the Muslims, coyness about the image of Islam that the
West had succeeded in linking to “extremism”, “terrorism” and savagery,
in addition to the image of Islam that the West had strived to link it
to backwardness.
- Concentrating
the Western thought along with some of its approved, such as democracy,
pluralism and general freedoms; one of the first declared aims of the
Grater Middle East Initiative was to spread democracy and “sound
government”.
- The
most dangerous undertaking of the West in its bid to alienate the real
Islam from life is formulating a new Islam that conforms to the American
fashion, namely the “democratic civil Islam”, by shrouding the Kufr
concepts with a “legitimate” cloak to pacify the emotions of the Muslim
laymen, forfeit the landscapes of the real Islam and dilute its thoughts
under the pretext of concord between Islam and secularism. The
“democratic civil Islam” that America is calling for is nothing but
secularism in a deceitful cloak. She had planned for Turkey to play a
meticulous “regional” role in the Greater Middle East to propagate the
new American religion. America wants to generalise the Turkish model and
turn it into an archetype with the aim of concentrating secularism in
the Muslims’ countries at the hands of what they refer to as “moderate
Muslims”. Former US President Bill Clinton heralded the role of Turkey
when he addressed the Turkish parliament by saying: “But, more
importantly, I believe Turkey's future will be critical to shaping the
21st century.” Hence, the pilgrimage of al-Ghannoushi and some of his
comrades to Turkey to acquaint themselves with the aspects of the
Turkish experiment on coexistence between Islam and secularism comes as
no surprise; the conspicuous stance of Turkey vis-à-vis the events of
the region and her support of the masses in what has been dubbed as the
revolutions of the “Arab Spring” should also not surprise us.
- Renovating
the Western thought afresh, i.e. “renovating secularism” by designing a
host of new jargons and slogans that do not evoke the emotions of the
Muslims and which are susceptible to elucidation and interpretation in
conformity with Islam, such as the jargons of “sound government”,
“reforms”, “civil society”, “civil state” and the like.
To continue reading, click here
Comment: Take heed, they have no difficulty demanding their way or the "highway" and expect us in the West to bow to them-you either stand up now for your values or be killed for having them-yes, killed! I understand the gravity of this comment, learn how a non-Muslim is treated in Islamic territory! Do not be mislead by our enemies's English explanation, they are replete with intentional misdirection.
No comments:
Post a Comment