Just how far have Muslims infiltrated the FBI? The posts of the last few days gave you a clue. Now they want the FBI out of the anti-jihad business. via The Daily Caller » Muslim advocates urge reduced FBI anti-jihad role
Politically influential Muslim activists are pushing to reduce the FBI’s role in countering Islamic terrorism and are seeking greater federal reliance on hard-line orthodox Imams.
The White House’s “Countering Violent
Extremism” program “did not produce the results a lot of us were hopeful
… [and] kind of collapsed towards the end of last year,” complained
Mohamed Elibiary, a Texas-based advocate who was appointed to the
Homeland Security Advisory Council.
“I don’t know where it is today … [but] it
presents us with the opportunity to look at the question of [whether]
it is right to house it within the FBI,” he said at an May 28 event in
D.C. staged by the Muslim Public Affairs Council.
The controversial CVE program was boosted
in 2011, when President Barack Obama directed the FBI to work with
Muslim political and community groups to suppress jihadi attacks, which
are dubbed as non-Islamic “violent extremism.”
But, said Elibiary, “we spun our wheels
for the last two years [and] we never got the national CVE policy across
all 56 [FBI field] offices.”
Instead, said panelists, the FBI has
continued its traditional policy of investigating jihadis for subsequent
trial and convictions.
In contrast, the Department of Homeland Security, Elibiary said, has done much good by trying to work with Islamic groups.
The CVE program has been slammed by
critics for giving too large an intermediary role to small Islamic
political groups such as MPAC, which portray themselves as
representatives of American Muslims. The groups try to foster the growth
of distinct Islamic communities.
The CVE training has also been criticized
for obscuring the many orthodox Islamic strictures that spur Muslims’
violence against non-Muslims.
Elibiary’s new call for reduced policing
of Islamic communities, such as Boston’s immigrant Muslims, was echoed
by other speakers at the panel, which was hosted by the progressive New
American Foundation in Washington D.C.
“Imams and counselors need to be given
some leeway” by police, said Suhaib Webb, Imam of the Islamic Society of
Boston Cultural Center.
Webb’s cultural center is affiliated with
the mosque attended by Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the ethnic Chechen Muslim who
along with his brother Dzhokhar killed three Americans with two bombs at
the Boston Marathon. Tsarnaev also killed a Massachusetts Institute of
Technology police officer after Boston police broadcast his photo on TV.
The police did not contact the main Boston mosque for help in
identifying Tsarnaev’s image, which was captured by videos of the
explosion and its aftermath.
Webb, who was disinvited from the state’s
April 18 memorial service by Governor Deval Patrick, said he can
persuade young men to stay away from violence. But “I need to be able to
sit down with someone and not be subpoenaed or be called as a witness”
in a later terrorism investigation, he said.
To succeed, government anti-terror
agencies should keep their distance from such outreach to angry youth,
he said. “We don’t need to be too close to each other, because that
undermines our [Imams’] street credibility,” said Webb.
No, you can’t make this shit up. PS: Obama spending “hundreds of millions of dollars” annually on Muslim engagement
Muslims in America have grievances, and
“the way to address these grievances is not with violence, but with the
way Islam prescribes… that way is best prescribed by Imams, not
necessarily by the U.S. government,” said Rashad Hussain, President
Barack Obama’s ambassador to the 57-nation Organization of Islamic
Cooperation.
Muslims in America “are concerned that
terrorists are killing innocent people,” Hussain said. Killing people
who are innocent is “totally repulsive to their religion,” he said.
‘“Conservative and Salafi Imams are going
to produce the most credible alternatives to al Qaeda” said panelist
Peter Bergen, who is the director of the national security studies at
the New America Foundation.
“It is going to be conservative Muslim
voices and conservative Muslim scholars that will have the credibility”
to persuade youth to stay away from violence, warned Rabia Chaudry,
founder of the SafeNational Collaborative, a firm which offers to teach
U.S. police about Islam’s blend of religion and politics.
She’s also suggests the media, the public and policy makers need to start enforcing Islamic blasphemy laws on “Islamophobes.”
By “conservative,” the speakers meant orthodox Imams, not free-market, small government conservatives.
One useful option, said Elibiary, would be for the government to allow young radicals an off-ramp from a pathway to jail.
Off-ramp, free-pass, sharia-law. Muslims are always the victims.Diana West takes it down by paragraph here, DHS Advisor Lays Out US Path to “No Go Zones” :
First of all, the “activists” — let’s
think of them as influence operators — are “influential” due to the
access and input the federal government, the Obama administration and
the Bush administration before it, gives them.
Second, the FBI’s role in countering
Islamic terrorism is already drastically reduced by the New Security
Orthodoxy that prohibits investigators from considering jihad as a
threat doctrine.
MPAC, just by the way, was founded
by “followers of the Muslim Brotherhood and admirers of Hezbollah” —
or is that “followers of Hezbollah and admirers of the Muslim
Brotherhood”? I get them confused.
Do
you see what is happening? This is a bid for enclaves, separate
societies presided over by Islamic authorities empowered to control
violence as US authorities withdraw. We are talking no-go-zones run by Islamic law.
Sharia, sharia, sharia.
Read it all.
No comments:
Post a Comment