Just like the IRS.
via The Daily Caller, Homeland Security: Respect pro-Shariah Muslim supremacists. (as if there were anti-sharia Muslim supremacists)
The Department of Homeland Security, which
under Secretary Janet Napolitano has shown a keen interest in
monitoring and warning about outspoken conservatives, takes a very
different approach in monitoring political Islamists, according to a
2011 memo on protecting the free speech rights of pro-Shariah Muslim
supremacists.
In a checklist obtained by The Daily
Caller entitled “Countering Violent Extremism Dos and Don’ts” the DHS’s
Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties notifies local and national
law enforcement officials that it is Obama administration policy to
consider specifically Islamic criticism of the American system of
government legitimate.
This policy stands in stark contrast to the DHS Office of Intelligence and Analysis’ 2009 memo “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” [pdf],
which warned of the dangers posed by pro-life advocates, critics of
same-sex marriage and groups concerned with abiding by the U.S.
Constitution, among others.
…
The checklist also advised against using
moderate Muslim “trainers who are self-professed ‘Muslim reformers’”
because they “may further an interest group agenda instead of delivering
generally accepted, unbiased information.”
The Homeland Security document also seems
to discount evidence unearthed by the Justice Department about the aims
of some mainstream Muslim organizations, warning law enforcement not to
rely on “unsubstantiated theories” and “conspiracies,” such as the
belief that “many mainstream Muslim organizations have terrorist ties”
or are “fronts for Islamic political organizations whose true desire is
to establish Sharia law in America.”
The manual advises trainees not to assume
Muslim Americans are “using democratic processes, like litigation and
free speech, to subvert democracy and install Sharia law.”
In fact, the Justice Department proved
that some very prominent Muslim organizations do have terror ties in a
2009 case and that they share the Muslim Brotherhood’s goal of Shariah
law. “The government has produced ample evidence to establish the
associations of CAIR [Council on American-Islamic Relations], ISNA
[Islamic Society of North America], NAIT [North American Islamic Trust],
with the Islamic Association for Palestine, and with Hamas,” U.S.
District Court Judge Jorge Solis said in the July 1, 2009 ruling.
Tim Clemente, a former FBI agent who
hunted Anwar Al-Awlaki and who has worked with Muslims to help stop
terrorist plots, told The Daily Caller the government overdoes its
sensitivity. Clemente says that the Muslim community “needs a
realization, not necessarily a reformation,” that only it can stop
terrorist attacks.
Read it all and closely examine the DHS memo linked at Daily Caller. Keen eyes will immediately note some of the absurd recommendations, particularly the don’ts such as:
Of
course not, why would anyone who wants to counter violent extremism
want to “venture too deep into the weeds of religious doctrine and
history” particularly when Muslim jihadists – the impetus for creating
DHS – cite religious doctrine as their justification.And agree with him or not, Zudhi Jasser seems to be on to something when he tweets:
Maybe he looked at the links at the bottom of the memo:
The LA Sheriff’s Dept (if anyone, TrentoVision?, can get that video we’d love to see and post it). See LA Sheriff Lee Baca’s multiple Muslim Outreach programsThe MPAC. See Salam Al- Marayati Head Of Terror Supporting MPAC To Be Panelist At DHS Conference
The Homeland Security Advisory Council. See DHS: Napolitano Swears in Freedom and Justice Foundation President and Chief Executive Officer Mohamed Elibiary to Homeland Security Advisory Council. The Muslim Brotherhood also uses the Freedom and Justice name.
It becomes quite clear why the government cannot protect its citizens: it doesn’t want to.
No comments:
Post a Comment